Score: 5

"Hmmn"

submission: TOOOOOOOF +

date: March 14, 2007

It's a shame that even respected artists feel the need for a bit of 'toof-bashing'. I honestly would have hoped that people of your e-stature would have kept out of the whole, messy affair.

Anyhoo, the graphics were good.
The lip-sync was perfectly functional, but a bit off at times.
The voices and sound-quality were great.
I put 3 for violence because this was a hate-flash and due to the cavity looking damn painful.
Play button and replay button...not much else needed.
It wasn't funny (for me).

Overall, I give you a five.
Definately a more eloquent toof-bashing cartoon, but I found that it contained an air of arrogance: stop telling Logo how he should make his series...it's his business.

I hope you can put your talent to a more pleasant use in the future.

Score: 10

":D"

submission: What is Love?

date: February 26, 2007

At the start, I had the feeling that I wouldn't find it too interesting...It seemed to be pretty bland. Fortunately, I kept watching and ended up really enjoying this. The graphics are extremely stylised, but I feel they are somewhat lacking; however the great animation more than makes up.
As close to a flawless cartoon as you can get: story-based, funny and nifty song.

Score: 3

"Bleh."

submission: Nobodies Shorts #6

date: February 15, 2007

That was lame to quite an intense extent. The graphics weren't bad at all, but it was just...pathetic. It wasn't funny and it wasn't long enough for any style to be established. Not to mention that the opening animation was felt as long as the main body of the cartoon.

I hate to leave such a negative review, but a bit more substance next time would be lovely.

Please try harder.

Score: 10

"That was fan-bloody-tastic."

submission: Good Morning!

date: February 11, 2007

Consistently badass graphics.
Amazing style - the bgs looked great and the characters were animated very well.
Great song and appropriate sound effects when needed.

I loved the ending, the camera man's face of mild-disbelief was just hillarious.

Real good job on this, I enjoyed watching it (what more could you ask for?).

You get a Five, a Ten and I'm going to submit it to the 'funny movies' collection :)

Score: 9

"Love it."

submission: Cuboy Ep.1

date: February 7, 2007

The whitmore-shaped hole in my heart has been filled. Thank you.

Score: 8

"I enjoyed that."

submission: Webcam Confessions

date: January 19, 2007

There was something about this which just made it great to watch. I think it's a combination of the sound and light colours. It would probably have been hillarious had I been hip and known about the whole blog thing... Either way, this is a fun cartoon which should definately make you smile. I know I did!

Score: 5

"Graphics or gameplay?"

submission: Cereus Peashy

date: January 16, 2007

The style of this game is awesome. The colours are brilliant as is the character animation. Despite this, I can't help but think that the quality of the game should be compensated for graphics. This is a major mistake. It seemed to me like you had a blur filter on the background and I would strongly advise that you remove it. This game was horribley laggy and, to be honest, not fun as a result. Please reconsider where the priorities of a game lie.

Score: 7

"Nifty!"

submission: .:Waves:. v2

date: January 14, 2007

The graphics were pretty simplistic and functional, but the style supported and advanced them. The style you used was consistent and extremely good - the style of this game is, for me, the highlight.
The music was inkeeping with the style and very good for the theme.
The concept of the game was pretty funny - move a boat around to avoid vomiting.

Overall it's a nifty little game. I enjoyed watching it more than playing it, as I couldn't use the controls at all, but it's still a fun way to spend 10 minutes.

Score: 8

"I liked this."

submission: TooF TCvST2

date: January 8, 2007

This episode seemed way funnier than the other ones. I'm not sure why, it just worked better. The fight scene was quite intense, the TooFsplosion was awesome. It would have been nice to have seen more general destruction in that sorta way.
Good job, 4/5.

ps: why did animatorjones' monster save the day?

Score: 9

"Ace."

submission: Castle III part B

date: January 7, 2007

You really seem to be fulfilling your creative vision, it's awesome to see it developing. Anyhoo:

Graphics: The backgrounds are amazing. You've worked hard on making sure that there is a consistent (and very high) standard throughout each scene. I knock of a single mark here, because the main characters are sticks. You've done great work, don't get me wrong, but no matter how different you make them (with reference to the haircuts and hats, etc), they'll only ever be sticks. Of course, this must allow you to spend so much time perfecting your backgrounds!

Your style is flawless. You manage to manipulate light seamlessly. I can't think up any criticisms for your style, other than that this episode was significantly slower paced than the previous one - there was a lot of walking with no plot/character development, which made it somewhat dull. For the script errors, I've deducted two points here.

The voice acting is, generally, solid. However the quality of Beecher's recordings were poor and Boomer sounded a tad bored. Great use of music throughout.

Overall: As I mentioned earlier, your truly suceeding in bringing your vision to (proverbial) life. Your directing ability is very good, except for the long periods of nothing which punctuated this film. For example: why show four shots of helicopters flying when only one would suffice? You need to work on the timing.

Small problems I found, but this is still a magnificent project. Very well done and a 5/5 for you.